January 30th. The day when M K Gandhi was assassinated in 1948 .
It was a political assassination, although at that time Gandhi had a cult following in India. India had just achieved her independence and was facing a war with her newly separated portion named as "Pakistan".
The people in the Punjab and Bengal were yet to recover from the aftermath of the violence that had taken plan during the partition.
Nathuram Godse had his own logic to justify his act. I am not a supporter of Godse.
Gandhi ji had gone overboard in his demand for the rights of the Pakistan, even as Pakistan was bleeding India with an attack on Kashmir.
There was a popular notion that Gandhi ji , on account of fairness, wanted the Indian Government to share more monetary resources with Pakistan. However, as Pakistan had already shown signs of a violent future with India, the Indian Government was reluctant to release any money for it.
Gandhi ji had reportedly gone on hunger fast to get that demand fulfilled. On the fateful evening of January 30th, he was planning to visit Pakistan, Both India and Pakistan were like his children, he claimed. However, what about the millions killed/ wounded/ maimed and hurt by the most violent acts committed during the partition by the rioting mobs ? He felt for those too, however he had failed to save them despite all his lofty ideals of "ahimsa".
He had promised that with non-violence the people would win freedom. That didn't come to happen. Losing 40% of the nation to an "Islamic" homeland was a huge let down for Bharat.
Gandhi's idea of ahimsa was also a skewed one. He didn't mind Indian soldiers dying in lakhs in the fight against Germany in WW 1 and WW 2. Yet, he wouldn't forgive Bhagat Singh or RajGuru for having avenged the killing of Lala Lajpat Rai.
Gandhi was a great personality and he was made greater by the media. Media was important even in those days. Media as always is owned by the rulers. So Gandhi was made famous with their support.
Anybody with some common sense will realize that he was a great leader with his own set of shortcomings and by no means the "Krishna" of the new age, as some adharmic crooks tried to propagate.
In my school days, I used to think of Gandhi as a saint and so January 30 used to make me sad. Now I realize that its all planned by the Supreme One.
India needs to reduce the heavy legacy Gandhi has left behind : the legacy of "unconditional " non-violence, where
1. To get killed in riots is ahimsa.
2. To fight back when attacked is himsa.
3. To send Indian soldiers to fight on behalf of the British rulers was ahimsa.
4. To fight the British rulers with the help of arms was "himsa".
I think that greatness is much more than such double standards of behavior.
Anyway, history has judged him kindly so far. However, in the days to come as the people become more enlightened, they may judge him more honestly and accept him for what he really was.
It was a political assassination, although at that time Gandhi had a cult following in India. India had just achieved her independence and was facing a war with her newly separated portion named as "Pakistan".
The people in the Punjab and Bengal were yet to recover from the aftermath of the violence that had taken plan during the partition.
Nathuram Godse had his own logic to justify his act. I am not a supporter of Godse.
Gandhi ji had gone overboard in his demand for the rights of the Pakistan, even as Pakistan was bleeding India with an attack on Kashmir.
There was a popular notion that Gandhi ji , on account of fairness, wanted the Indian Government to share more monetary resources with Pakistan. However, as Pakistan had already shown signs of a violent future with India, the Indian Government was reluctant to release any money for it.
Gandhi ji had reportedly gone on hunger fast to get that demand fulfilled. On the fateful evening of January 30th, he was planning to visit Pakistan, Both India and Pakistan were like his children, he claimed. However, what about the millions killed/ wounded/ maimed and hurt by the most violent acts committed during the partition by the rioting mobs ? He felt for those too, however he had failed to save them despite all his lofty ideals of "ahimsa".
He had promised that with non-violence the people would win freedom. That didn't come to happen. Losing 40% of the nation to an "Islamic" homeland was a huge let down for Bharat.
Gandhi's idea of ahimsa was also a skewed one. He didn't mind Indian soldiers dying in lakhs in the fight against Germany in WW 1 and WW 2. Yet, he wouldn't forgive Bhagat Singh or RajGuru for having avenged the killing of Lala Lajpat Rai.
Gandhi was a great personality and he was made greater by the media. Media was important even in those days. Media as always is owned by the rulers. So Gandhi was made famous with their support.
Anybody with some common sense will realize that he was a great leader with his own set of shortcomings and by no means the "Krishna" of the new age, as some adharmic crooks tried to propagate.
In my school days, I used to think of Gandhi as a saint and so January 30 used to make me sad. Now I realize that its all planned by the Supreme One.
India needs to reduce the heavy legacy Gandhi has left behind : the legacy of "unconditional " non-violence, where
1. To get killed in riots is ahimsa.
2. To fight back when attacked is himsa.
3. To send Indian soldiers to fight on behalf of the British rulers was ahimsa.
4. To fight the British rulers with the help of arms was "himsa".
I think that greatness is much more than such double standards of behavior.
Anyway, history has judged him kindly so far. However, in the days to come as the people become more enlightened, they may judge him more honestly and accept him for what he really was.